Sure. If you don't understand that money is an abstract representation of human time and energy. Which implies that government issued money is actually the time and energy of their "subjects".
Do governments own their people?
Sure. If you don't understand that money is an abstract representation of human time and energy. Which implies that government issued money is actually the time and energy of their "subjects".
Do governments own their people?
Governments own their money. If you value your wealth in their money then you get what they give.
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1GPqbWQNSX8E5551YnanhMU4bhScjmHuYb VerifiedNot the ones who outsource their currency to private banks.
Do governments own their people? It is a simple question. And it is important because money is productive human time and energy in abstract.
If a government choose to outsource their currency to a private bank so be it.
When you create your own government and rule your own kingdom you can do what ever the fuck you want but until then chill with the libral bullshit.
Is it "liberal bullshit" to ask if governments own their people?
Seems you may need to confront this question internally, since you have avoided it twice already.
As for ownership - the people are not owned by their gov - they are in partnership with their gov.
As for ownership - the people are not owned by their gov - they are in partnership with their gov.
Okay... maybe so, to some degree. So the next question must be whether or not the partnership is fair and mutually beneficial.
That is not true. A partnership is a state of cooperation for mutual interest, and it thus implies equal footing. Governments are monopolistic on this planet, and that is why I don't think partnership is accurate. Not liberal BS either. We are property.