Not the ones who outsource their currency to private banks.
Do governments own their people? It is a simple question. And it is important because money is productive human time and energy in abstract.
Post by twetch#3033
If a government choose to outsource their currency to a private bank so be it.
When you create your own government and rule your own kingdom you can do what ever the fuck you want but until then chill with the libral bullshit.
What the chain says
- Block
- 626 264
- Time
- 2020-03-15T02:41:15Z
- Signer
- 1GPqbWQNSX8E5551YnanhMU4bhScjmHuYb
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3033
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GPqbWQNSX8E5551YnanhMU4bhScjmHuYb VerifiedReplies (11)
Is it "liberal bullshit" to ask if governments own their people?
Seems you may need to confront this question internally, since you have avoided it twice already.
Reposted
twetch#3033 6.6y
As for ownership - the people are not owned by their gov - they are in partnership with their gov.
As for ownership - the people are not owned by their gov - they are in partnership with their gov.
Okay... maybe so, to some degree. So the next question must be whether or not the partnership is fair and mutually beneficial.
If you don't like the partnership arrangement here are your options:
- Leave it
- Get enough partners (citizens) and change it
- Complain
So you are consciously aware that governments believe they own their people. And you are okay with that idea.
That is not true. A partnership is a state of cooperation for mutual interest, and it thus implies equal footing. Governments are monopolistic on this planet, and that is why I don't think partnership is accurate. Not liberal BS either. We are property.
If you feel that your partnership with your government is not mutually aligned you have three options:
- Leave it
- Get enough partners (citizens) and change it
- Complain