!IMPORTANT: "THYRISTER"
This will become pretty important later.
SIRISYS Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.
1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 142 Posts
Activity
R: Okay it worked. We are clear to Section 2, bringing CentConn online now. @[G] you have the conn. [R] shifting to Vanguard.
Annuluus russing Hilbert's Flare @ The Archives Mall.
Reposted
twetch#9216 5.8y
Devnotes: [f_n] calls "SEEK Process Limit" function; "Function[n]".
This method allows for [n] to carry [NAN] without violating "Two's in Common". This can be useful for stepping between "Unsigned Ones'" and "Signed Two's" Complements.
#SIRISYS
Reposted
twetch#9216 5.8y
Clarification request: Did you mean to say who forgives mean gravity's tho?
Devnotes: [f_n] calls "SEEK Process Limit" function; "Function[n]".
This method allows for [n] to carry [NAN] without violating "Two's in Common". This can be useful for stepping between "Unsigned Ones'" and "Signed Two's" Complements.
#SIRISYS
Reposted
twetch#11711 6.6y
The idea was to leave people with a clear path to ascension themselves. Accelerating their development could lead to unforeseen consequences. I think they wanted people who BOTH morally and technologically advanced to join their ranks.
Clarification request: Did you mean to say who forgives mean gravity's tho?
Gravity forgives naught.
f_n @ "Jews"
Her: You don't even understand ECDSA let alone use it.
Me: Pfft. . . I moire Galois fields with real running time stator transducers, made from Motorola RAZR's, bridged to coin-op Bell telephones, in my living room.
We lived happily ever after.
You are most welcome to the follow @2385 my dear One you don't say So "Jango!" unabashshed Lee's typo.
As far as AlpaFold's being overhyped goes, I'd check with the officials' official statement on their position relative to the matter before I'd vote. $2
f_r Jobs' proteges on Twetch, while not knowing how to parse f_u undeer @1's @2's @4 _ You get paid for $3 Woz @U.
TwetchDat@ @15671's avatar:
E: Found it. [R]_forker.
R: Clarify.
S: The R(_R) Retro_ality triggers an [R_level] split in retrocausal protocols with [R(infected)] versus [R(strong)] running in simultaneity until only one remains which becomes the [R(strong)] variant post facto.
Me: Therefore the funding incremental are contiguity displacements?
Prof: We'll come back to that. For now, as say in the hive "Let us go shake our money makers" and get the focus back on funding.
Prof: Yes, though "Bolztmannian Parametric Metric Metricity" comes off as gibberish to the Euclidean "Dub_stepped" mind. When you place evolving metricity's inside metricized recursions inside unmetricized recursions, you'll need a stepwise bit framing.
Me: I see. Thank you for explaining it to me Professor.
Prof: Show me?
Me: The charge invariant may be gauged as charge invariant per unit spacetime with spacetime gauged as the charge invariant units per unit. The gauge which gauges the gauge.
Prof: Yes, you understand. The answer is always "More Funding". Remember, there exists ONLY ONE UNIVERSAL Pi. Which, as a transcendent encapsulates all other LOCAL Pi. When you see "Pi" you may say: "Valid up to a point."
Me: "Yes Professor, I get your point. Though for me to construct the system, I must understand the fuel source [FUNDING]."
Prof: "Ah, I see now. You are looking at the Kolmogorovian Complexity limitations of the $elf($elf). Self within the self."
Me: "Yes, funding. What I do not understand here are your base units of funding? You have Square Seconds' Kelvin per Kilogram Square Meters. How can a second be square? How can a square meter have mass?"
Prof: Funding, the answer is always more funding.
Prof: "My equation posits that the DNA basis protocol [Pi_eater] exists as the Bekenstein-Kolmogorovian Complexity limitation of it$elf. The boundary condition occurs as the irreducible, thus defines the funding parameter."
Prof_cont: "DNA occurs as the most complex known structure in existence and cannot be expressed in a more succinct manner than it$elf. The $elf($elf) (self within the self) recursion exists as the funding convertor."
Me: "Perhaps I understand. You are establishing the limits of information density in terms of exchange rates with it$elf exchanging it$elf with it$elf? Measured against a substrateless pure $self?"
Prof: Funding, the answer is always more funding.
Me: I see. Thus your units "Per Square Seconds' Kelvin, are boundary condition step sums of exchange within a Bolztmannian parametric metric metricity governed by thermionic degeneration?"
Prof: Yes, the thermionic degenerate affords Minkowskian validity.
@ProfessorBekenstein " I feel curious as to how you resolve your Pi dependency? The way you have it written, your information density limits are procedural system limitations. Was that your intention?"
Prof: The answer is funding, always. More funding.
Apologies Ben, translator error from this side.
The original message was quite friendly and about the "n_Coby" effect.
Hopefully you can parse past the knee jerk.