Post by twetch#9216
@ProfessorBekenstein " I feel curious as to how you resolve your Pi dependency? The way you have it written, your information density limits are procedural system limitations. Was that your intention?"
Prof: The answer is funding, always. More funding.
What the chain says
- Block
- 663 571
- Time
- 2020-11-30T15:44:45Z
- Signer
- 1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#9216
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w VerifiedReposted by (1)
Replies (12)
Me: "Perhaps I understand. You are establishing the limits of information density in terms of exchange rates with it$elf exchanging it$elf with it$elf? Measured against a substrateless pure $self?"
Prof: Funding, the answer is always more funding.
Me: "Yes, funding. What I do not understand here are your base units of funding? You have Square Seconds' Kelvin per Kilogram Square Meters. How can a second be square? How can a square meter have mass?"
Prof: Funding, the answer is always more funding.
"How can seconds be square", you say?
well, if a second can be a cube, than of course it can be a square! the real question is how can a second be a cube
Me: "Yes Professor, I get your point. Though for me to construct the system, I must understand the fuel source [FUNDING]."
Prof: "Ah, I see now. You are looking at the Kolmogorovian Complexity limitations of the $elf($elf). Self within the self."
Prof: "My equation posits that the DNA basis protocol [Pi_eater] exists as the Bekenstein-Kolmogorovian Complexity limitation of it$elf. The boundary condition occurs as the irreducible, thus defines the funding parameter."
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.