Prof: Yes, though "Bolztmannian Parametric Metric Metricity" comes off as gibberish to the Euclidean "Dub_stepped" mind. When you place evolving metricity's inside metricized recursions inside unmetricized recursions, you'll need a stepwise bit framing.
Post by twetch#9216
Me: I see. Thank you for explaining it to me Professor.
Prof: Show me?
Me: The charge invariant may be gauged as charge invariant per unit spacetime with spacetime gauged as the charge invariant units per unit. The gauge which gauges the gauge.
What the chain says
- Block
- 663 573
- Time
- 2020-11-30T16:43:45Z
- Signer
- 1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#9216
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w VerifiedReplies (8)
Prof: Yes, you understand. The answer is always "More Funding". Remember, there exists ONLY ONE UNIVERSAL Pi. Which, as a transcendent encapsulates all other LOCAL Pi. When you see "Pi" you may say: "Valid up to a point."
feels
twetch#7453 6.2y
the assumption that the euclidean distance function (normal metric) is globally accurate in this space is absurd
Me: Therefore the funding incremental are contiguity displacements?
Prof: We'll come back to that. For now, as say in the hive "Let us go shake our money makers" and get the focus back on funding.
/fund @2518 $218
now what would cracker think of this?