Ah! I figured I was missing something with the shapes, but I couldn't put my finger on it...!
Post by twetch#17303
It's no coincidence the triple shape adds up to 15 both ways I'm sure, but 'each shape is worth 5' doesn't fit the rest of this puzzle's logic.
What the chain says
- Block
- 631 333
- Time
- 2020-04-19T20:49:08Z
- Signer
- 1EZKvwVyKb9LtwnHCtXAneub8w5WuoX3oL
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#17303
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EZKvwVyKb9LtwnHCtXAneub8w5WuoX3oL VerifiedReplies (5)
Agreed.
By this interpretation it’s indeterminate.
🖼 vs 🖼
Not at all. The bananas define it. Four bananas is 4, three is 3. For it to be indeterminate, any quantity of bananas would have to be equivalent to any other quantity, the same way Peter thought a 4-sided geometric was equivalent to a 5-sided one.
How do you ᴋɴᴏᴡ the poly shapes are to be counted by sides and not as whole entities?
I just explained that. Because a bunch of 3 bananas is not worth 4.
What's a defining quality of a geometric shape? How many sides it has.