Also convinced he was a shaman and had extensive experience with psychedelics and out-of-body experiences connecting with the non-physical realm of spirits and entities
Just in case any Catholics were excited about my devotion
Post by twetch#13259
The archetype you referenced is ABRAHAM. If you are Christian or Jewish, you believe he was going to sacrifice his son Isaac, if Muslim, his son Ishmael . All three religions stem from this event. Christians just repeated it. The Father sacrificing the Son
What the chain says
- Block
- 658 894
- Time
- 2020-10-29T00:12:59Z
- Signer
- 1DfKiBGSH9yiJp462nwrz2ptBfpaLhYazT
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#13259
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1DfKiBGSH9yiJp462nwrz2ptBfpaLhYazT VerifiedReplies (7)
No I think Jesus represents a progression of that archetype. Sacrifice for your blood is not the same as sacrifice for posterity in general. The former is ingrained biologically and the latter is a moral development in human culture
Sacrifice of the son Jesus to god the father is not as interesting to me as the sacrifice of an influential man in favour of the generations to come-not of his bloodline but of his ideological heritage. Love the idea of thoughts permeating beyond blood/man
Jesus is a progress in the prototype because he was actually sacrificed (in the story), whereas Abraham was stopped by God's hand. I know that part doesn't interest you (I find it morbid) but Christianity wouldn't exist without this sacrifice.
I doubt Abraham was stopped is likely an after redaction of the story. Name change of the sacrifice (Isaac vs Ishmael as you pointed out) shows multiple versions floating round. I bet first version was pro-human sacrifice then later taboo & redacted.
One of the lines that always perplexed me was: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”
Those sound like the words of a man regretting the situation he got himself in, not a demigod
it interests me in that it draws a line between freewill and fate