Post by JSON

Unverified · twetch

I think the BSV community would be better served by embracing what makes BSV different instead of insisting that "BSV = Bitcoin."

To most of the world, Bitcoin means BTC. Whether we like it or not, that's the reality today. Telling newcomers that BSV is Bitcoin often creates confusion, and when they realize exchanges, wallets, and the broader market use "Bitcoin" to mean BTC, it can leave a bad first impression.

BSV doesn't need to pretend to be BTC. It should stand on its own merits:
massive scaling, low fees, stable protocol, and on-chain utility.

If those strengths are real, they should speak for themselves.

Build on BSV. Promote BSV. Let the technology do the convincing.

184dvP…Ga4u Unverified · twetch

Isnt BTC breaking into thirds right now?

633 913 sat
What the chain says
Block
Unconfirmed (mempool)
Time
2026-07-31T02:03:57Z
Signer
184dvPfjnC6AXqVZGgVMGxhECYrWYfGa4u
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 184dvPfjnC6AXqVZGgVMGxhECYrWYfGa4u Unverified

Replies (1)

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@184dvP…Ga4u

are you talking about bitcoins like 100th fork, bip 110?
and yes, yes it is split again....