I think the BSV community would be better served by embracing what makes BSV different instead of insisting that "BSV = Bitcoin."
To most of the world, Bitcoin means BTC. Whether we like it or not, that's the reality today. Telling newcomers that BSV is Bitcoin often creates confusion, and when they realize exchanges, wallets, and the broader market use "Bitcoin" to mean BTC, it can leave a bad first impression.
BSV doesn't need to pretend to be BTC. It should stand on its own merits:
massive scaling, low fees, stable protocol, and on-chain utility.
If those strengths are real, they should speak for themselves.
Build on BSV. Promote BSV. Let the technology do the convincing.
What the chain says
- Block
- 960 126
- Time
- 2026-07-30T15:42:07Z
- Signer
- 1BMZMHcZxqmczGoW3BPuE4NqSEUxYoPHUj
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1BMZMHcZxqmczGoW3BPuE4NqSEUxYoPHUj Unverified