Post by twetch#116

1HsARx…32gH Key · twetch

Miners didn't do it. Everyone is overplaying this. The guy was arrested. They did a court order 'freezing' his coins in the sense that he would be held liable if coins were spent. He agreed to turn them over.

It's not a 'miner freeze.'

What the chain says
Block
622 940
Time
2020-02-20T23:13:51Z
Signer
1HsARx3TiY2iYHWoyu4XF88fZq9rih32gH
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#116

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1HsARx3TiY2iYHWoyu4XF88fZq9rih32gH Verified

Replies (3)

1HsARx…32gH Key · twetch
Replying to@1HsARx…32gH

Everyone gloating 'see! We told you that you could freeze Bitcoin! Welcome to law!' miss the point that nobody really contests that a court can make you turn over your wallet and keys and impose severe penalties if you don't.

1HsARx…32gH Key · twetch
Replying to@1HsARx…32gH

That said, a miner freeze order could in theory be possible, or an exchange blacklist. Mike Hearn was I think the first person to ever talk about this, back in 2011/12.

1Nk1B6…fP8B Key · twetch
Replying to@1HsARx…32gH

alright thanks for clarifying. Aounded like bs right away.

I wish the cultists would stop muddying the waters