Post by twetch#2049

17zmPi…WWU2 Key · twetch

That's just straightforwardly incorrect. I suspect some kind of aprioristic reasoning error. If Amazon accepted BSV, it would obviously be a massive win and cause the price and utility to immediately jump up.

And "the masses" can just buy BSV with fiat...

185NV1…5jvL Key · twetch

The more bsv amazon has to dump the lower the price, is like giving bsv to weak hands, masses buy, amazon sells. only when amazon (merchants) demand bsv because they understand its value, only then it will help. The aim is to make merchants bitcoiners.

What the chain says
Block
635 515
Time
2020-05-19T00:15:13Z
Signer
185NV1BqaeZVeUTKAYQwThj29eY78i5jvL
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#2049

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 185NV1BqaeZVeUTKAYQwThj29eY78i5jvL Verified

Replies (1)

185NV1…5jvL Key · twetch
Replying to@185NV1…5jvL

We do not need a pipe through which bitcoins passes.
fiat=>bsv=>fiat = back to where we were.
who wins? exchanges
We need fiat=>bsv=>saving and then bsv=>bsv=>bsv