Post by twetch#12873

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch

If you Like, Comment and Branch this Post, I will Follow you. Offer is good for as long as I'm solvent LOL. #SFW #fun

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch

shouldn't you be solvent enough to follow someone after they comment branch and like this post. what's the math on who ends up with "winning" in this series of transactions. The person who is liking branching and commenting or the one who follows in return

What the chain says
Block
617 086
Time
2020-01-11T04:28:55Z
Signer
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#12873

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ Verified

Replies (5)

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

Yes, I suppose I should clarify. Setting aside mining fees and exchange volatility, the prompted behavior is designed to game-theoretically zero-sum:

5¢ (Like) + 2¢ (Reply) + 3¢ (Branch) = 10¢ (Follow)

1/3

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

Of course, changes to the fee structure — e.g., in response to this Post’s externalities — could result in a net loss, hence the solvency caveat.

It naturally follows that this Post comprises:

2/3

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ
  1. an IQ test (you are taking the test);
  2. an economic/social incentives experiment (#Twetch founders are the subjects).
  3. a longitudinal N-of-One clinical trial (I am the subject; your Reply is the second control intervention)

3/3

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

why isn't the cost per transaction relative to USD. I'm new to this technology, but I thought it was zero sum...the transaction should balance the same regardless of worth of BSV against the dollar.

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

sorry. Why is the cost per transaction relative to the usd. BSV should affect the dollar...not the other way around