shouldn't you be solvent enough to follow someone after they comment branch and like this post. what's the math on who ends up with "winning" in this series of transactions. The person who is liking branching and commenting or the one who follows in return
Post by twetch#13837
Yes, I suppose I should clarify. Setting aside mining fees and exchange volatility, the prompted behavior is designed to game-theoretically zero-sum:
5¢ (Like) + 2¢ (Reply) + 3¢ (Branch) = 10¢ (Follow)
1/3
What the chain says
- Block
- 617 100
- Time
- 2020-01-11T07:18:18Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#13837
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (4)
Of course, changes to the fee structure — e.g., in response to this Post’s externalities — could result in a net loss, hence the solvency caveat.
It naturally follows that this Post comprises:
2/3
- an IQ test (you are taking the test);
- an economic/social incentives experiment (#Twetch founders are the subjects).
- a longitudinal N-of-One clinical trial (I am the subject; your Reply is the second control intervention)
3/3
why isn't the cost per transaction relative to USD. I'm new to this technology, but I thought it was zero sum...the transaction should balance the same regardless of worth of BSV against the dollar.
sorry. Why is the cost per transaction relative to the usd. BSV should affect the dollar...not the other way around