Per capita is a difficult concept.
Don't worry about it.
Post by x
Yeah that’s not true at all. https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/
What the chain says
- Block
- 970 101
- Time
- 2026-10-08T00:38:29Z
- Signer
- 1C7ZJjaUSC2ykbFoxuNWJUpYPQ63Fi2baJ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1C7ZJjaUSC2ykbFoxuNWJUpYPQ63Fi2baJ UnverifiedReplies (10)
Probably just some kind of illusion that every second school shooter is a trannie even though they make up a tiny percentage of the population.
Grand total of 5 in the past 20 years vs 6000+ males for general mass shootings. Statistically you are more likely shot by a cis male. What you’re experiencing is reporting bias.
"General" is doing so much heavy lifting here it's gonna get back problems.
But you know that.
You’re free to do your own research. If you want to talk mass shootings (4+ shot) it’s 6000 to 5, you are still more likely to be shot by any random cis male than a trans person