Grand total of 5 in the past 20 years vs 6000+ males for general mass shootings. Statistically you are more likely shot by a cis male. What you’re experiencing is reporting bias.
Post by Y
"General" is doing so much heavy lifting here it's gonna get back problems.
But you know that.
What the chain says
- Block
- 970 101
- Time
- 2026-10-08T00:44:20Z
- Signer
- 1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R UnverifiedReplies (7)
You’re free to do your own research. If you want to talk mass shootings (4+ shot) it’s 6000 to 5, you are still more likely to be shot by any random cis male than a trans person
I see you felt a need to pivot away from school shooters, and to general mass shootings and I get it.
Reality is hard.
But the takeaway is this:
Don't murder random people because of your personal issues and nobody cares about your lifestyle.
That's a good thing. Congratulations.
Oh, and don't touch kids.
That's it.
I’m trans, not catholic.
You can do the same math if you want but it makes it 150 to 3 which at best is a little closer to equal per capita. Not enough to say trans people are above a norm.