wouldn’t a metanet just be a surveillance network that annotates all the other transactions on chain (at least w/ an init tx followed by categorization txs) : @1 + @5
Post by twetch#11711
otherwise you’d be looking at very unwriter txs designed to create waste for the miners and stats OR a lot of people + a lot of cocaine + a twetch clone
What the chain says
- Block
- 663 838
- Time
- 2020-12-02T16:36:48Z
- Signer
- 18ZWnrQ2ijRHUCKfWMot5iPCEGp4mWe2gL
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#11711
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
18ZWnrQ2ijRHUCKfWMot5iPCEGp4mWe2gL VerifiedReplies (9)
CCC has two storage units of hard drives and documents being migrated to BSH, but that still wouldn’t take up 70% of BSV.
you can figure this one out w/ a desktop and an afternoon of cryptanalysis... just track the % and relative tx sizes before and after twetch was created
twetch#11711 5.9y
wouldn’t a metanet just be a surveillance network that annotates all the other transactions on chain (at least w/ an init tx followed by categorization txs) : @1 + @5
identifying an automation would be as simple as taking tx constants re: string length of various identifiers and dividing them over the metanet txs sizes
@2 : if $I was CSW $I would prune twetch txs after replaying them in a sub system that gives CSW royalties later when others can’t sync Twetch on chain w/o paying additional tolls