- Convince HathorMM that validating TXs for fees is rational
- Feed competing miners enough revenue to outhash HathorMM
- Disallow 0-value UTXOs (not "market" driven but suggested by @205 )
@40 has compelling reasons why #3 is a bad idea. I'm not sure.
Post by twetch#1784
For the record...I'm not against disallowing 0-valued UTXO's to be spent. I'll accept. I'm all for experimenting and letting the free market decide.
I'm pointing out that 0-valued UTXO's start a slippery slope and reducing the demand for Satoshis.
What the chain says
- Block
- 660 482
- Time
- 2020-11-09T02:23:45Z
- Signer
- 17DJKzxx6XvzHy41vRTYU91ugMtFY1CNQ2
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#1784
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
17DJKzxx6XvzHy41vRTYU91ugMtFY1CNQ2 VerifiedReplies (1)
Important clarification, thank you!