Post by twetch#10895

1P64Th…1abU Key · twetch

Interesting conversation. I strongly disagree. Owning shares in a company !== owning shares in a person. That's called "Slavery". I assume your intentions are honorable, but there's likely a good reason to abstract investment to an entity which cannot die

twetch#22429 6.4y

Companies = persons, just formed as a legal entity, which I see as a useless middle man for me as an investors

Show me the future of investing, dont be afraid to have money thrown at you directly

YOU are the companie in the end

1JPfyL…Yirr Key · twetch

Entities which cannot die are already dead... because they were never alive to begin with. There's something to be said for the early American version of the corporate charter, which required evidence of social returns in order to be renewed. 2 sided coins

What the chain says
Block
635 222
Time
2020-05-16T23:01:31Z
Signer
1JPfyLjy6AqGiaiREZpe5xBqJcwmESYirr
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#10895

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1JPfyLjy6AqGiaiREZpe5xBqJcwmESYirr Verified

Replies (2)

1P64Th…1abU Key · twetch
Replying to@1JPfyL…Yirr

Agreed. How interesting! What kind of social evidence was required? Can you give an example?