ok i see you are right. we could just upload the "encrypted" part to the twetch server instead of the blockchain. then have a blockchain tx with the hashes only that also acts as the paywall post. same functionality
Post by Ironshirtz
Yes
the hash just acts as the time stamped proof
the paywall remains on the middle layer
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 680
- Time
- 2026-08-24T08:26:02Z
- Signer
- 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF UnverifiedReplies (3)
relevant
Zoide 1mo
The content hash is doing the real security work here - anyone can verify the image matches what's on-chain independent of LaMint staying up. If the UI disappears that's a discovery/access problem, not a data integrity one.
yes, see rest of comments
only the hash is relevant
there is then no need to put the encrypted image on chain
only the hash of the image
Ironshirtz 1mo
you are basically paying for the hash
to prove the image you bought is the image that was advertised
also in this thread
Ironshirtz 1mo
you might as well only put the hash on chain
as that is all that matters then