The sender runs this risk in both scenarios, but I am more inclined to read the messages that pay me instead of someone else. If it was bullshit at least I was compensated for waisting my time.
Post by twetch#1512
It’s your choice, for this reason. If you want a good signal Boost will seethe you better - but ultimately it is up to you to choose your inbox economics. If you prefer to be paid, set your Boost threshold higher than your Pay threshold.
What the chain says
- Block
- 628 725
- Time
- 2020-04-01T07:01:21Z
- Signer
- 14p2YkJcMmj8JgpwAihBe6i2JGJ5LHSqKJ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#1512
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
14p2YkJcMmj8JgpwAihBe6i2JGJ5LHSqKJ VerifiedReplies (4)
I think it's fine to demand money to receive a message but there should be a legally binding contract obliging you to read the message.
Please write a script whereby the sender funds an output which can only be redeemed by decrypting the Baemail. A send and a release funds to self?
Maybe you could use Legally Chained for that. @1350
I was going to figure this out myself, or ask Stas.