Post by twetch#1489

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch

If you received money for sending you a message, how do I know you didn't just take the money and not read the message? With Boost, you know it's likely that your messages will be read.

1G7DLq…4kZS Key · twetch

The sender runs this risk in both scenarios, but I am more inclined to read the messages that pay me instead of someone else. If it was bullshit at least I was compensated for waisting my time.

What the chain says
Block
628 718
Time
2020-04-01T04:01:20Z
Signer
1G7DLq695juhR7QFz5jn1AaXH55Hxn4kZS
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#1489

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1G7DLq695juhR7QFz5jn1AaXH55Hxn4kZS Verified

Replies (11)

14p2Yk…SqKJ Key · twetch
Replying to@1G7DLq…4kZS

It’s your choice, for this reason. If you want a good signal Boost will seethe you better - but ultimately it is up to you to choose your inbox economics. If you prefer to be paid, set your Boost threshold higher than your Pay threshold.

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch
Replying to@14p2Yk…SqKJ

I think it's fine to demand money to receive a message but there should be a legally binding contract obliging you to read the message.

14p2Yk…SqKJ Key · twetch
Replying to@1Abd9y…ujrm

Please write a script whereby the sender funds an output which can only be redeemed by decrypting the Baemail. A send and a release funds to self?

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch
Replying to@14p2Yk…SqKJ

Maybe you could use Legally Chained for that. @1350

14p2Yk…SqKJ Key · twetch
Replying to@14p2Yk…SqKJ

I was going to figure this out myself, or ask Stas.

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch
Replying to@1G7DLq…4kZS

With Boost it's your incentive to set the difficulty to exactly the level which limits information to an amount that you actually want to read. If you get paid to receive the message nobody really knows if you would really read it, despite what you say.

1G7DLq…4kZS Key · twetch
Replying to@1Abd9y…ujrm

I see your point, but I think that setting a minimum price for the messages to appear in my inbox would be more interesting.
Boost doesn't guarantee to the sender that I will read a message, so I see no difference. The miner already got the money anyway.

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch
Replying to@1G7DLq…4kZS

It doesn't guarantee. It's just something that you can expect. When you accept money, there's a reason to receive the message other than because you want to read it.

1G7DLq…4kZS Key · twetch
Replying to@1Abd9y…ujrm

What kind of customer would be your main target for this? Companies trying to reach people to which they are not familiar?
I think boost is a great idea but the more obvious use cases for me are not email inboxes. Public sources of info is a strong one IMO

Continue thread →