Post by Actual Ayyy

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

I hope reality is unbounded (even though it's all fated, I know that for sure, at least here) and not infinite.

If reality is unbounded, that means there could be an endless number of fated experiences, just like this one only endlessly different. But the key is, that *it doesn't have to include any hellish experiences/hells".

Infinite reality must include all hellish experiences/hells. Every form of them.

Unbounded reality can include ZERO.

This is a strange concept derived from the fact that Bitcoin is unbounded.

What the chain says
Block
960 444
Time
2026-08-01T19:19:33Z
Signer
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p Unverified

Replies (6)

1Fz9Yq…prkX Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

God is our father in heaven that wants us to sacrifice the lower things for the higher things so we can fit in with the ultralight beam that is his identity. The compression of time and the existence of evil forces us to make a decision. Thats the point of this place and everything that enters and leaves and all predetermined possibilities is under his provision.

The judgement is just truth, its the realization that you sacrificed eternal communion with God and his virtues for temporary sins of the flesh. Our bodies withers like grass so when you worship it with your soul you condemn your soul to wither with it when you die

319 234 sat
18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Fz9Yq…prkX

No, we don't make any decisions, because free will doesn't exist.

If free will doesn't exist (it doesn't, it's impossible here) then hell is irrational.

Only an irrational, evil, malicious God would create hell, given the conditions of our experience.

1Fz9Yq…prkX Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

We cant gain a vantage point to prove any philosophical statements because we’re not outside the system we’re trying to prove— Not even the angels in heaven knows Gods face. When someone claims they’ve proved what millions have hashed at for hundreds of years it always throws me off

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Fz9Yq…prkX

We are 100%, always bound by past experience and "animal" instinct.

I'm not sure which is more "important", probably past experience in most cases.

Both of these are imbued by a random beginning. To random parents. Who imprint you before you are even conscious, before you have memory.

We are imprinted by genetics (random) and parents/external influences personalities (random).

We become conscious, we already have likes and dislikes imprinted. We did not "choose" these. They just exist within us already, because of external influences (past experience) and genetics (instinct).

We proceed to grow with all these imprints. We feel like we are choosing throughout - but we aren't. We are DEFAULTING. We may be presented with "multiple options", but we cannot possibly choose any of the options but one, because of imprinting from past experience, and instinct. We default to one of the "options". We never had an option. We were bound to do one thing over the others, due to our imprinting from past experience (leading back to a random beginning), and instinct.

That isn't free will. That's deterministic.

Free will is 100%, objectively not possible here. I'm not even sure why it's a debate, honestly, it's obvious it's not possible here.

Continue thread →