I interviewed via messages. Fair enough. I did try to ask questions that may reveal new information but i respect your honesty thankyou.
Post by pxl
So he probably generated these aswers the same way as he does for his tweets (worked for 23s).
maybe you form something special and entertaining with these answers to get more attention? never underestimate the wrapping when sharing informations.
pxl 4.1y
People accept stories without facts, but not facts without stories.
312 378 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 960 969
- Time
- 2026-08-05T10:27:17Z
- Signer
- 1F5ptiZEJyLKxrJ12i11igzEiQsmdogQC3
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1F5ptiZEJyLKxrJ12i11igzEiQsmdogQC3 UnverifiedReplies (7)
What do you mean? I put these questions and answers out because i had an oppotunity to ask some questions and i thought the community would enjoy them. I also thought as twetch has just been re released it would be a good way to get people on here. I literally havent released any of it on x? If it was for attention i would of put on x first.
The task of a journalist is to process the information for the reader, not merely to pass on the raw information. You mentioned the terrible interactions, so I thought you wanted to see more engagement. Btw, Twetchers aren't even big CSW fans in general.
Ok tell me how i process the information. You sae the info right.... what exactly do i process and also isnt "processing" called editting?
That's exactly what a journalist's job is, which I am not.