The task of a journalist is to process the information for the reader, not merely to pass on the raw information. You mentioned the terrible interactions, so I thought you wanted to see more engagement. Btw, Twetchers aren't even big CSW fans in general.
Post by 369BSV
Ok tell me how i process the information. You sae the info right.... what exactly do i process and also isnt "processing" called editting?
What the chain says
- Block
- 960 972
- Time
- 2026-08-05T11:14:49Z
- Signer
- 15AdFPQbdHDWrTFqcudN94CgF5mmh3ts6y
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
15AdFPQbdHDWrTFqcudN94CgF5mmh3ts6y UnverifiedReplies (4)
That's exactly what a journalist's job is, which I am not.
Fair enough. I dont feel good editting a direct written answer to a question it feels like im changing the truth. Maybe in a spoken interview there would be editting to take out the ummm and awww but to change the actual written words of csw feels disingenuous?
writing in your own words what you learned is not editting. leave out a few details neither. adding your own thoughts and doing interpretations can be interesting, but definitly needs good writing skills, so the reader knows what was said and what are assuptions from the writer. if you do something like a summary, better to ask the interviewed person if he is ok with it. anyway do what feels right to you. but like I said we have enough too long discourses of CSW on Twitter. keeping it short in an elegant style is not his strength. it's sad he only pastes the AI outputs in his tweets.
I was going to write my thoughts at the end. Once i had posted all 6 parts.
312 378 sat