I disagree, art is art. Doesn't matter to me whether it's on a digital canvas or a physical one.
Post by Actual Ayyy
@127 doesn't seem to feel grifted and in fact seems to enjoy collecting NFT's without being sure if he'll profit or lose on them in the end. There's of people like that out there. These things have value to people.
What the chain says
- Block
- 969 180
- Time
- 2026-10-01T14:34:56Z
- Signer
- 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p UnverifiedReplies (9)
Retardation is prevalent in the space. It's not a very good supportive argument. But if you feel this way buy some more and hope for them to appreciate. And if they don't at least you can look at them on your phone when you need a pick me up
I don't like speculating on NFT's at all, I think most will go to 0.
Another point I just made to him is "What if a famous artist released an NFT collection, would they be worthless?" What if da vinci, or banksy, etc, released an NFT collection? People would value them. They would retain their value and appreciate, actually. Doesn't matter that they can be "copy pasted", there's still digital provenance attached to the originals, there's still true ownership.
People will because money laundering services have value
Sure, but to others the art itself has value as well.