Post by Moseh

1PrjkJ…NoiF Unverified · twetch

its only required for starting a chat, if a user dms you, replies are free

1Dd26X…fm3x Unverified · twetch

Feel like messaging is pretty fundamental on social media and paying $10 monthly to have the option kinda whack, if u pay 1 month and message everyone and dont pay the next month will you still have it?

What the chain says
Block
959 975
Time
2026-07-29T12:31:41Z
Signer
1Dd26XR9YZjxdHZbdM5sF8628E5GaHfm3x
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Dd26XR9YZjxdHZbdM5sF8628E5GaHfm3x Unverified

Replies (6)

1PrjkJ…NoiF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Dd26X…fm3x

have to make trade offs, will continue to address it and iterate, in a perfect world none of this would be necessary

1Dd26X…fm3x Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1PrjkJ…NoiF

Yeah i get that, I think paid unlock chat is far better than $10 sub personally. And even better would be setting a price to dm you in your own user settings.

Keep up the good work tho

641 796 sat
1PrjkJ…NoiF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Dd26X…fm3x

definitely something we can consider as an adjustment. goal is not to paywall features as much is it is to protect our users, not fun to deal with lol

1Dd26X…fm3x Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1PrjkJ…NoiF

Fair enough, I even think user having to follow each other to dm would stop any kind of mass dm like what happened.

General scams could still happen, as they could even with pay wall. Hopefully this is a big lesson for people. Feelsbadman for everyone who got burned

321 156 sat
Continue thread →