Because if you believe that people should be forced into your barbarian cult, you are a violent person, Tone, even though you don't act directly as such, but indirectly, by supporting violence against those who don't disagree with you
Seems kinda fascist.
*agree
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R VerifiedYou are free to move out aren't you? I think the people that came before you built a system they thought was the best they could. I am not talking about the government, but about you fellow compatriots. If you have a better system, persuade them.
So you support violence against peaceful people who don't want to join your cult, because they could flee??
Are you sure?
No way they could live their lives without being forced or having to flee?
You are no 'live and let live' person?
Scary.
If we disagree on something very important and consequential to us, like you think my house belongs to you, I would request the government to remove you against your will.
You want others think like you, you have to persuade them in a non violent way.
That would be "dispute resolution", which could be handled in a variety of ways. As is the case with basically every service provided by government. History shows that the "legitimate" monopoly on force (gov) often winds up behaving like organized crime.
I'm not the one arguing for violence, you are
How about your cult having to persuade others to join instead of using violence?
See the inconsistency?
Why can your cult force people, violating their individual rights?
How to get that special privilege?