That is literally "pay to play". It's not going to hold politicians more accountable .. exactly the opposite. PACs will have no problem ensuring theirs are the questions asked.
Post by twetch#32
I think it will break their wallets when they can't cheat.
What the chain says
- Block
- 659 486
- Time
- 2020-11-02T04:54:45Z
- Signer
- 1CVFrAUPhsMy2VVLQKhpuwn9N7W5X2v2dx
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#32
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CVFrAUPhsMy2VVLQKhpuwn9N7W5X2v2dx VerifiedReplies (10)
Who has to cheat? All you need is a deeper wallet than those who are competing with you to boost their questions. Organizations will beat individuals 99.9% of the time. It's baffling to me why people don't see that BoostPOW is pay to play concentrated.
it's already pay2play
and you and I cannot "play" in the current system. But with POW we each get a vote that is ranked by energy and the deep-pocketed now must actually pay up for energy instead of just wash trading fiat and user attention amongst themselves.
Reposted
twetch#6484 7.3y
The proof-of-work also solves the problem of determining representation in majority decision making. If the majority were based on one-IP-address-one-vote, it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.