Imagine the presidential candidates had to answer the top 10 questions with the most Boost POW attached.
Perhaps people can hold politicians more accountable in the future?
Post by twetch#2584
That is literally "pay to play". It's not going to hold politicians more accountable .. exactly the opposite. PACs will have no problem ensuring theirs are the questions asked.
What the chain says
- Block
- 659 483
- Time
- 2020-11-02T03:16:45Z
- Signer
- 1ECoyqwZ9FRQNnY4bZDRUdcR2M4JvXNzaD
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#2584
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1ECoyqwZ9FRQNnY4bZDRUdcR2M4JvXNzaD VerifiedReplies (10)
I think it will break their wallets when they can't cheat.
Who has to cheat? All you need is a deeper wallet than those who are competing with you to boost their questions. Organizations will beat individuals 99.9% of the time. It's baffling to me why people don't see that BoostPOW is pay to play concentrated.
it's already pay2play
and you and I cannot "play" in the current system. But with POW we each get a vote that is ranked by energy and the deep-pocketed now must actually pay up for energy instead of just wash trading fiat and user attention amongst themselves.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.