Peck by Actual Ayyy

1JhKv5…y2UL Unverified · twetch

Yes. We showed the BSVA policy to our attorney, and he said it could only be honored if it was domesticated to a Florida court order, and coordinated to the jurisdictions of every other mining operation.

This is a very high threshold, and the process would apply just as much to BTC as to BSV.

In fact, the protocol is fully functional on any bitcoin-based network.

So, it's a super outside possibility that it ever gets used, and if it ever did, the precedent applies just as much to any bitcoin-style chain as it does to BSV. @51413

Actual Ayyy 2mo

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

I think co-ordination in the future, at scale, is inevitable. Even between countries. So I think confiscation/reallocation is inevitable at scale, in the future.

I also think that's a good thing, because again, I'm leaning heavily towards "Bitcoin without confiscation is an existential threat". Criminal networks, etc..

Better to have confiscation than risk billions of deaths (Yes, I think this might be possible and has been predicted, with non-confiscatable Bitcoin).

327 600 sat

What the chain says

Transaction: 680c5b9334678b24cc2282c04ce878bb5697a8252250aa341c750358e65f88f6
Block: 960 016
Time: 2026-07-29T21:17:49Z
Signer: 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
App: twetch
Type: reply
Content type: text/markdown
Reply to: 56db778b367765383cef0555f441a7d4a8d30484238c154d8d8d7f1cf3aa68af

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p Unverified

Replies (1)

Actual Ayyy 2mo

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

Thanks @292 @114 I understand more than I did yesterday

654 397 sat

Post by Actual Ayyy

Replies (1)