Post by Kurt 🦧

12zCJp…sWGg Unverified · twetch

Have coins been confiscated? I understand the concern of the association policy, but I’m not convinced that an alert would actually be honored. Any such action risks a spilt and has real potential cost to miners

327 198 sat
1JhKv5…y2UL Unverified · twetch

Yes. We showed the BSVA policy to our attorney, and he said it could only be honored if it was domesticated to a Florida court order, and coordinated to the jurisdictions of every other mining operation.

This is a very high threshold, and the process would apply just as much to BTC as to BSV.

In fact, the protocol is fully functional on any bitcoin-based network.

So, it's a super outside possibility that it ever gets used, and if it ever did, the precedent applies just as much to any bitcoin-style chain as it does to BSV. @51413

What the chain says
Block
960 016
Time
2026-07-29T21:13:38Z
Signer
1JhKv5bs1wpHRYFAQS4qF5zhKfAnXAy2UL
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1JhKv5bs1wpHRYFAQS4qF5zhKfAnXAy2UL Unverified

Replies (3)

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1JhKv5…y2UL

Wen twonksuit?

654 932 sat
18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1JhKv5…y2UL

I think co-ordination in the future, at scale, is inevitable. Even between countries. So I think confiscation/reallocation is inevitable at scale, in the future.

I also think that's a good thing, because again, I'm leaning heavily towards "Bitcoin without confiscation is an existential threat". Criminal networks, etc..

Better to have confiscation than risk billions of deaths (Yes, I think this might be possible and has been predicted, with non-confiscatable Bitcoin).

327 600 sat
18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

Thanks @292 @114 I understand more than I did yesterday

654 397 sat