Yes, until businesses realize moving or signing wealth can be done for a fraction of any custodial service on the BSV blockchain. Free for all, miners can gobble up millions of value signed transactions per second without a hiccup and no stopping in sight.
Post by CriticalRoots
The question is whether world commerce is already too monopolized by the owners of fiat system, who appear to also own blockstream/btc. Or will enough value demonstration emerge that puts bsv adoption into the inevitable side of things, regardless.
What the chain says
- Block
- 666 441
- Time
- 2020-12-20T22:30:38Z
- Signer
- 1GgyBPgTRm568SQZVtd1fo1KVqJ3VLL7iv
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GgyBPgTRm568SQZVtd1fo1KVqJ3VLL7iv VerifiedReplies (5)
bsv functionality cant really be replicated in the traditional system so theres that.
But yea the TPTB are all in on BTC
No, it can't, and there are plenty of actors in the traditional system now who have vested interest in NOT seeing a variety of things move on chain. Whether natural or not, that type of resistance is real. What is, is.
trying to stop the big data use of BSV would be like banning mysql or cloud computing
"banning" is not the only tactic available to prevent, slow, or otherwise hinder adoption.
One key difference between bsv big data compared to mysql or other db software is that the latter do not require network effect.