Post by twetch#2584

14QXph…wJdx Key · twetch

At this point I would like to again thank Dr. Wright for the Bitcoin invention.

It was his call to arms to "Compete with me" and come up with something "completely new" that gave me inspiration to help build out @24 's Boost Protocol.

Boost is Bitcoin

17mNxa…zGjY Key · twetch

It's unfortunate that Boost will only work in the absence of better signalling mechanisms. Signalling consolidates to the best, most direct, form of signalling.

What the chain says
Block
628 948
Time
2020-04-02T19:49:47Z
Signer
17mNxa3wLR3UpkxzBHkTQ1ynn6boQ3zGjY
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#2584

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 17mNxa3wLR3UpkxzBHkTQ1ynn6boQ3zGjY Verified

Replies (4)

14QXph…wJdx Key · twetch
Replying to@17mNxa…zGjY

Dont worry, once a better signalling mechanism comes along. Then we will just build on that and slap a "New and Improved" sticker on it baby.

Just kidding, nothing is better than Boost at signalling. It's good enough for Bitcoin Headers, it's set in stone

17mNxa…zGjY Key · twetch
Replying to@14QXph…wJdx

For example, in the case of Baemail, actually sending the recipient more money is better signalling. So Boost will not work. This is a great case that you will be able to clearly see that I am right.

14QXph…wJdx Key · twetch
Replying to@17mNxa…zGjY

Absolutely paying for 1 on 1 message is a great way to get the desired effect of having them read your message.

The same cannot be said for group chats, forums, news feeds, search results, product reviews and ranking, etc...

17mNxa…zGjY Key · twetch
Replying to@14QXph…wJdx

Yes. You are right about this. Good. As long as you know what contexts it will work, you won't be disappointed.