1/
This thread will present my hypothesis that Q may be showing us how language itself is used to enslave and control society.
Those aware of these fundamental flaws and ambiguity are able to make the system work for themselves and their agenda.
Post by twetch#15870
2/
To frame the thread, let's review some core themes from Q drops:
- words have mathematical values
- sentence structure/grammar/[mis]spelling matters
- language is coded
- drops are fractal
What the chain says
- Block
- 621 794
- Time
- 2020-02-12T20:29:11Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15870
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (6)
3/
By fractal, I mean the information in drops can apply to multiple domains and varying scale:
- surface level 'face value' interpretation
- occult/symbolic interpretation
- mathematical interpretation
- cross-referential interpretation
- ...
4/
Could Q be teaching us to decode drops so that we can apply that fractal lesson at a larger scale: to language as a whole?
Is it possible that we have been taught a form of grammar and way of speaking that is inherently ambiguous and error-prone?
5/
If we are taught as children to think/speak/write using ambiguous language, we can always be exploited by those cognizant of this structural weakness [by design].
This is especially true in the arenas of:
- constitutions / governments
- contracts / law
6/
Is it possible to write a mathematically unambiguous contract? regulation? constitution?
Yes!
Have we done that? Has anyone done that?
Shouldn't it be a core requirement to eliminate ambiguity?
Instead we are stuck in a system of illusions [by design].