4/
Could Q be teaching us to decode drops so that we can apply that fractal lesson at a larger scale: to language as a whole?
Is it possible that we have been taught a form of grammar and way of speaking that is inherently ambiguous and error-prone?
Post by twetch#15870
5/
If we are taught as children to think/speak/write using ambiguous language, we can always be exploited by those cognizant of this structural weakness [by design].
This is especially true in the arenas of:
- constitutions / governments
- contracts / law
What the chain says
- Block
- 621 794
- Time
- 2020-02-12T20:29:11Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15870
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (3)
6/
Is it possible to write a mathematically unambiguous contract? regulation? constitution?
Yes!
Have we done that? Has anyone done that?
Shouldn't it be a core requirement to eliminate ambiguity?
Instead we are stuck in a system of illusions [by design].
7/
The topic that started me thinking along these lines was Trump's repeated use that his Ukraine call was 'PERFECT'.
Could Trump have been signaling "Legally Perfect".
Legally Perfect is a concept used in law and diplomacy and is ...
7/
The topic that started me thinking along these lines was Trump's repeated use that his Ukraine call was 'PERFECT'.
Was Trump signaling he was working from a "Legally Perfect" document.
Legally Perfect is a concept used in law and diplomacy and is ...