Peck by twetch#622

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Feature request for Twetch...

Compress branched twetches down into a single instance on my feed. I don't want to see the same post ten times on my feed! I want to see more content for the same time input.

Signal:noise.

What the chain says

Transaction: 3b3c86e02847776203adb03998dc5c13d4e51035b748e2c39265144ff6cefc7c
Block: 623 759
Time: 2020-02-26T15:29:08Z
Signer: 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#622

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C Verified

Reposted by (4)

twetch#7109 Reposted · 6.6y
twetch#59 Reposted · 6.6y
twetch#2022 Reposted · 6.6y
twetch#1933 Reposted · 6.6y

Replies (10)

twetch#2275 6.6y

1AE48v…F1NS Key · twetch

Replying to@1Eyk15…d43C

this is not as easy as it sounds

if we did this some users wouldn't get their branch pushed to the feed or seen

we don't want to be curating content for people

twetch#1933 6.6y

1LkKZd…J96j Key · twetch

Replying to@1AE48v…F1NS

Single branch instance != single users branch instance

twetch#2275 6.6y

1AE48v…F1NS Key · twetch

Replying to@1LkKZd…J96j

still not right

you would then be paying every brancher for the next branch in line

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1AE48v…F1NS

The solution probably lies in the incentive model, then.

Too much branching compared to new content creation. Leads to too much noise just because it's repeated so many times. It's not that the content itself is bad.

Continue thread →

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1AE48v…F1NS

What?

I thought because I said it, it would already be done!! :)

Even if you employ a different solution, I'd appreciate the higher signal:noise ratio.

Perhaps raise the cost of branching...

twetch#3667 6.6y

1K3F5A…ziH7 Key · twetch

Replying to@1Eyk15…d43C

YES! And so if it is branched (xx) times it will always remain top of feed.

twetch#3667 6.6y

1K3F5A…ziH7 Key · twetch

Replying to@1K3F5A…ziH7

"quoting" as already exists creates new content. So I definitely agree branching could be like x+x+x+x person branched this and quoting always remains a seperate twetch

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1K3F5A…ziH7

I like that.

It's not Twetch curating. It's users either adding value, or bumping it to the top of your feed.

The more who branch it, the less money each will make, but that's ok because it still spreads the content, while rewarding all who branch.

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1Eyk15…d43C

And if the division of payments for branching is done based on your following list rather than a global variable, it will pay based on reaching new people more than just reaching many people.

Those who spread content benefit most.

Post by twetch#622

Reposted by (4)

Replies (10)