Single branch instance != single users branch instance
Post by twetch#2275
still not right
you would then be paying every brancher for the next branch in line
What the chain says
- Block
- 623 764
- Time
- 2020-02-26T15:59:41Z
- Signer
- 1AE48vXR3aXUzEtmhRDVomrymGvETqF1NS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#2275
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1AE48vXR3aXUzEtmhRDVomrymGvETqF1NS VerifiedReplies (2)
The solution probably lies in the incentive model, then.
Too much branching compared to new content creation. Leads to too much noise just because it's repeated so many times. It's not that the content itself is bad.
Actually, here's a thought... There are two types of branches. One adds value, the other merely shares the same content with no additional content.
Treat them differently.
Spread the payment over some, but not others. Incentivizes adding content.