Peck by twetch#18283

13xxTY…RgDG Key · twetch

I found this article interesting. Blockchain was intended to be private, not fully anonymous; at least that was my understanding.

nakedsecurity.sophos.com Sophos News - The Sophos Blog The Sophos Blog

What the chain says

Transaction: 32439aa989af31434f31b0e78723d7537ecad7df737fbeeb892bbcca9ec60f87
Block: 622 649
Time: 2020-02-18T19:44:16Z
Signer: 13xxTYfXUfcoTow32Ygwxj6r2NUWTnRgDG
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#18283

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 13xxTYfXUfcoTow32Ygwxj6r2NUWTnRgDG Verified

Replies (2)

twetch#17961 6.6y

1PLd5c…25zQ Key · twetch

Replying to@13xxTY…RgDG

It is disturbing that government would need to know about every stick of gum, coffee or roll of toilet paper one would buy. I was raised under the impression that I have the right to be secure in my "persons, houses, papers, and effects." -made up crimes-

twetch#18283 6.6y

13xxTY…RgDG Key · twetch

Replying to@1PLd5c…25zQ

I think there's a distinction to be made between privacy and anonymity. Some may conflate the two.

Post by twetch#18283

Replies (2)