Decentralized af.
Exactly as I thought bitcoin is in 2011
Post by twetch#16592
There has to be a line somewhere. If the people pushing BTC are using an altered version of the original Bitcoin then they should not be allowed to call it Bitcoin because they are lying to everyone and deceiving them. It’s fraudulent.
What the chain says
- Block
- 623 841
- Time
- 2020-02-27T05:37:42Z
- Signer
- 16Wa4DdaWeTWJtfWomHZHRXwGE1wLfH34U
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#16592
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
16Wa4DdaWeTWJtfWomHZHRXwGE1wLfH34U VerifiedReplies (25)
hashrate seems to favor the original chain, let the people decide which coin is fraudulent
The hashrate favors the first mover advantage chain (BTC) because there are massive amounts of propaganda tricking people into believing BTC is still Bitcoin. If people understood that BTC is propped up by digital fiat (Tether), slow asf and can’t scale...
Don't think it's propaganda, but it's just a genuine concern for those who not only want the privileged people to run a full node, but people in developing countries as well. The cost are to run a full node are lower with small blocks
It’s definitely propaganda. Why do they need to run a full node? They can just use BSV (because it scales), is faster, way more efficient, follows the original protocol, and is simple to use. There is no need for them to run a full node or small blocks.
Give it time.
that wouldn't be a decentralized network then.
How so?
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.