There has to be a line somewhere. If the people pushing BTC are using an altered version of the original Bitcoin then they should not be allowed to call it Bitcoin because they are lying to everyone and deceiving them. It’s fraudulent.
Post by twetch#14723
hashrate seems to favor the original chain, let the people decide which coin is fraudulent
What the chain says
- Block
- 623 841
- Time
- 2020-02-27T05:37:42Z
- Signer
- 1DgpULqStGMt77MUitMwycjyHwzifcQifN
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#14723
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1DgpULqStGMt77MUitMwycjyHwzifcQifN VerifiedReplies (25)
The hashrate favors the first mover advantage chain (BTC) because there are massive amounts of propaganda tricking people into believing BTC is still Bitcoin. If people understood that BTC is propped up by digital fiat (Tether), slow asf and can’t scale...
Don't think it's propaganda, but it's just a genuine concern for those who not only want the privileged people to run a full node, but people in developing countries as well. The cost are to run a full node are lower with small blocks
It’s definitely propaganda. Why do they need to run a full node? They can just use BSV (because it scales), is faster, way more efficient, follows the original protocol, and is simple to use. There is no need for them to run a full node or small blocks.
Fuck this running full nodes bs.
BSV is alarmingly centralized nontheless.
to be self sovereign and not depend on a third party; full nodes enforce the consensus rules as well....Privacy is another reason. Safety is also a big one. There is many reasons why you should run your own full node
Give it time.
that wouldn't be a decentralized network then.
How so?
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.