Peck by twetch#20102

twetch#20102 6.6y

14eidz…wyqs Key · twetch

@852 Can I humbly request an ignore list, just like the follow list but instead it would automatically hide posts from them from my point of view? For reply chains containing an ignored user I imagine the post being replaced with .

What the chain says

Transaction: 2545562cb6bfcb719930d4c0ecc9aee33aa7dde24ecbe92d9706002b82a416e8
Block: 625 821
Time: 2020-03-11T23:33:12Z
Signer: 14eidzA2vstUZeW2zszHX5Fo329LgKwyqs
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#20102

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 14eidzA2vstUZeW2zszHX5Fo329LgKwyqs Verified

Replies (4)

twetch#17303 6.6y

1EZKvw…X3oL Key · twetch

Replying to@14eidz…wyqs

there's a couple I'm not interested in looking at either, but ignore lists tend to create thoughtbubbles, and you see how well that's going on twitter

twetch#20102 6.6y

14eidz…wyqs Key · twetch

Replying to@1EZKvw…X3oL

I agree with your sentiment, however taking that to its logical conclusion, so does the following list. Which is actually much more a bubble creator. I.e I ask for exclusive, everyone except those I don't like vs inclusive only those I agree with.

twetch#17303 6.6y

1EZKvw…X3oL Key · twetch

Replying to@14eidz…wyqs

Which is why Latest should be default instead

twetch#20102 6.6y

14eidz…wyqs Key · twetch

Replying to@1EZKvw…X3oL

Oh agree, everything seen by default but I do think people should have at least the choice what they see, it is not up to others to determine for them what they can or can't consume. With that in mind I still think an ignore list is an important feature.

Post by twetch#20102

Replies (4)