Those who redefine well known words to fit their argument, have neither a good argument nor are interested in discussion. There is no fruitful dialogue possible, beware of that when you need to interact with those.
14eidz…wyqs
14eidzA2vstUZeW2zszHX5Fo329LgKwyqs
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 100 Posts
Activity
All things considered, the added value of human labour is the only thing that makes anything have a value in the first place. But not all labour is valued equally or even at all. Currencies derive value out of what you can do with it in the future.
Applied, I regard democracy as an economic system disguised as a political system and communism as a political system disguised as an economic system. Which makes it a lot easier to understand why some things work for one but not the other and vice versa.
It is called a tactical retreat, surely a concept Americans are well familiar with.
the red coats lost, get over it
https://twetch.app/t/e251fa28db5af79206492a15fe3b1b445afbd2632e40d17344f808453bc45f0f
the red coats lost, get over it
https://twetch.app/t/e251fa28db5af79206492a15fe3b1b445afbd2632e40d17344f808453bc45f0f
It's an incomplete assessment, as these are liberal values born from ideas popularised by individuals such as John Locke and then spread to the then new world. Calling it Anti-American can be misinterpreted as to dismissing the majority British heritage,
judging someone based on the color of their skin or the religion they are born into is inherently anti-american
prove me wrong
Evolution is a harsh mistress, if your ideology prevents healthy offspring, it will eventually die out. But don't be too pessimistic, due to mutation at some point it will be reborn. In a sense evolution is the ultimate open market economy.
I've observed that frequently those who are the loudest supporters of socialism have the most obnoxious asocial behaviour.
No matter how you dress it up, preferential treatment based on protected attributes is discrimination. If those attributes happen to be heritage and location of origin it is also racist. If they relate to gender and/or gender identity, it is sexism.
They also all happen to be equally dead. Death is the great equalizer. those who advocate for equality of outcome are by consequence also advocating for suffering and death.
The year was 2048 and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker.
IMO Inflation in 'fiat' is required to have the ability to prevent supply to become inaccessible and thus hinder the functioning of an open market. However as demonstrated people and thus banks and governments can't be trusted with this responsibility.
increasing the money supply is itself inflation
https://twetch.app/t/a07cdd3b5ede0b2a9ef5fed8f097872082de5d33a611bd42b7f875d028ada9fe
Welcome, hope you enjoy your stay! And please be aware any post is for ever and open to the public, so you are immortal now in a sense. Including all grammar and speeling mistakes :-)
Considering nazism is based on national socialism whilst communism on international socialism, both systems have resulted in the loss of liberty and life, perhaps it is prudent to understand the commonality between those two to avoid future repetition.
Curious, from my observation it has been mainly racists using racists rhetoric that bring up race equality.
How much do you want for it?
Absolutely, it is wasted effort to get the 0.01% of the population to switch from one thing to another, when you could use that energy to invite the other 99.99%, even if most of them go to the 'competitor' it is still a huge net plus.
the idea that we must turn BTCers into BSVers is wrong
imo they will be the last to admit defeat
for now we need to focus on creating exciting new technologies to show the layperson that speculation is not a necessary part of being a bitcoiner
Yeah I don't think you'll regret it, I deleted facebook about two years ago and there wasn't a single day since then that I regretted doing that, following that experience I also removed my twitter. Some social media platforms are just toxic to the soul.
Had to experience the mob myself, I posted about individualism on Facebook and felt it's wrath. It's never made me more confident in what we are doing here. Going to delete Facebook now
For the repair, diesel or the toxic anti-fouling? Don't get me wrong, I like big boats but I am not to keen on hypocrisy and commercial faux activism.
i was paying for the rainbow warrior 🌈
Yeah I can imagine, twitter I primarily stopped because I really didn't like their business conduct, though being so pedantically principled doesn't do me any favours, so I don't judge others who are by all accounts a bit more grown up about it :-)
Ironically, the slowest way to die is by living a healthy life.
I think it has more to do with the 'reasonable' part and less with the 'enviromentalist/lefty' part. If there is no requirement to categorise it is prudent not to do so unless wanting to show your own bias.
The best metric by which to measure if someone is a reasonable enviromentalist/lefty is their openness to nuclear energy
Oh that is hilarious, thanks for the laugh!
Well if you want a real challenge, try challenging the most powerful institution in the presence of mankind. ;-p
we are challenging the most powerful institutions in the history of mankind
that is what we are doing here
One option is to get a tax accountant and subtract the accountants cost as administrative costs.
Is that a gentle reminder that organised religion doesn't like competition, especially on an open market? :-)
My observation; Communism does work, within the boundaries of your family, socialism does work within the boundaries of your social circle. What is important to realise that these can only work if the overall structure is based on liberty.
Proof, well, we know that every major civilisation (going all the way back to the Sumerians) at one point or another had a figure with similar accomplishment as our current understanding of Jesus, not entirely sure what it proofs though :-)
Proof of existence first.
Yes I wouldn't recommend suicide to proof a point, as far as we know there is only one life, so it is rather precious commodity and I rather enjoy our conversations so I personally I feel it would be a shame if that would be removed from our future.
Universes die every day and you are still here. Don't make me slit my wrists and finish you off.