i got an academic expert telling me nuclear isnt the solution and im just buying more because these experts are fake fucking news
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1sNJWUrAYfdxAKN1zGq3t9hwyR6ynQwas VerifiedThe best metric by which to measure if someone is a reasonable enviromentalist/lefty is their openness to nuclear energy
I think it has more to do with the 'reasonable' part and less with the 'enviromentalist/lefty' part. If there is no requirement to categorise it is prudent not to do so unless wanting to show your own bias.
Perhaps my phrasing was bad. What i mean is if a person is legitimately motivated by reducing carbon emissions/pollution (as opposed to advancing a political agenda) they tend to be more open to nuclear power
correct
Nuclear is a great option. Whether it can be deployed and operated more cheaply than solar/battery is the question now.
Imagine being long coal hahaha
💯
Wrong expert. Ask an insurance underwriter. Nukes are pure communism at its finest. Nukes cannot afford disaster insurance which all industrial companies routinely buy from free markets. Taxpayers subsidize nukes— if U love high taxes build more nukes.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.