The haters would not win because they are effectively paying someone they despise by disliking. And augmenting his popularity.
Post by twetch#3596
Which proves the hate for them. Am I just hating to hate or do I want that person to know to suck a dick? The point here is whether good or bad, the creator made something that got attention and their data should be worth money for a like or dislike.
What the chain says
- Block
- 620 911
- Time
- 2020-02-06T18:11:40Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3596
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (18)
Agreed, and this happens organically regardless. But if there is a dislike feature, there must also be a feature to sort by most disliked. Because hilarity function.
I agree with all of that except I think a dislike should be worth 1/100th of a like.
I wish i could dislike this because i dont like it or agree.... but you deserve 5 cents whether i like it or not. See what I am saying.
If dislikes are worth as much as likes, you incentivize mindless "shock" content versus mindful content. There needs to be a difference between like or dislike. How much difference I don't really know. I'm just venturing with 1/100th.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.