Agreed, and this happens organically regardless. But if there is a dislike feature, there must also be a feature to sort by most disliked. Because hilarity function.
Post by twetch#4022
I agree with all of that except I think a dislike should be worth 1/100th of a like.
What the chain says
- Block
- 620 913
- Time
- 2020-02-06T18:21:34Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#4022
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (20)
I wish i could dislike this because i dont like it or agree.... but you deserve 5 cents whether i like it or not. See what I am saying.
If dislikes are worth as much as likes, you incentivize mindless "shock" content versus mindful content. There needs to be a difference between like or dislike. How much difference I don't really know. I'm just venturing with 1/100th.
We can get paid if we dislike
Not really, imo. Each individual's value curve is precisely individual. There are shared aspects that emerge in groups as some shape of distribution, but there are people who genuinely like Vader more than Skywalker. Equal weight provides better feedback.
Filtering control is key here
Adding dislikes would add density to controversial subject matter and encourage debate.
have you ever tried publishing shock content within the constraints of one single paragraph? to call that mindless is ignorant
what is also ignorant is considering shock content worth less than regular content for example, shock content is priceless 😈
I would imagine you are between 16 and 25 years old. I am not calling anyone mindless. And you should not call me ignorant either. Because you know nothing about me. And within a single post you can convey a lot more than you think.
PIC = 1000 words
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.