Why do you think that? I could just kill you and take your money. There's no moral foundation behind money. If I am smart enough to not get caught, my social status would rise. Group cohesion would decline.
Post by twetch#3375
I have already explained why I think that in the twetch you are responding to. You can also attempt to use nefarious means to gain social status as a christian.
What the chain says
- Block
- 624 356
- Time
- 2020-03-01T18:59:38Z
- Signer
- 1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3375
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm VerifiedReplies (6)
The only reason you are declaring robbery and murder as nefarious means is because of religious dogma. Times used to be different before religious morals came along.
No I'm not. Please don't tell me what is in my mind.
We are all influenced by the norms of our society, which are a result of religious morals. There were societies in which rape and murder were not immoral and normal at their time.
Look as like @931 has a fire going here. Before I go and get some popcorn, why would one be considered an idiot in someone else's story while being a hero in one's own story?
I cannot attest to the cause of moral systems within societies with a reasonable degree of certainty but I can observe the effects of defined institutions. Religions provide subculture orientation through subjective alignment.
That doesn't mean that you know that religious dogma is the only reason for me to say something. (Dogma is actually the opposite of reason btc.)