Anyone else realized that the whole point of Kleiman v Wright is to delay Satoshi from dumping his coins?
Post by twetch#15764
To me it seems like the point is Kleiman getting a few hundred thousand BTC.
5 more months and we'll see the ruling. Hopefully.
What the chain says
- Block
- 623 697
- Time
- 2020-02-26T06:33:41Z
- Signer
- 1LiXKir5ru4HDBzJ5JYUfDnLV4wmRBzBjY
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15764
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1LiXKir5ru4HDBzJ5JYUfDnLV4wmRBzBjY VerifiedReplies (5)
If the partnership can be proven.
I'll call this right now.
There is no partnership
Craig will win the case because Dave kleiman could have told his shit brother anytime that he had hundreds of thousands of btc, he didn't. He died broke. Ira is a pawn being used to stifle actual BITCOIN
just think it thru, dave has 500,000 btc, he's dying, he could have told his parents, could have told his brother, his gf, his friends, he could have sold some to pay his bills, instead he borrowed against his home.
Ira is chasing shadows with opm.
if dave wanted to he could have set up his own trust to release his coins to his family at some point in the future... dave knew he was dying for months and months, but had no motive to cash in or guard his 500,000 btc??? come on... get real. he was poor!
Why would tether defend the case? And then stop supporting.
They delayed enough to pump BTC.