Post by twetch#22429

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

Have not looked into Baemail yet, but I assume you profit from all the interaction in Baemail.

So lets say there is a "main Baemail" BSV wallet, where your profit goes.

Would you take money and in exchange give the investor a certain % of all income from

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

from that "main Baemail wallet" for a certain time? (all negotiable of course, question of details)

That would be interesting. Investors help you to scale, you have no risk taking the money other than let them participate from the income

Classic investing

What the chain says
Block
635 305
Time
2020-05-17T10:43:25Z
Signer
1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#22429

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV Verified

Replies (17)

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch
Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

And the investor would not have to care whether Baemail is a company or just Deggen as a private person

All risks are on the investor's side, he has to do his job to find out if you are capable and trustworthy

again: classic investing

1P64Th…1abU Key · twetch
Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

Totally agree. This is a good idea. Right now I run a script which pays out a percentage of Baemail revenue to a split of Paymails, with this concept in mind.

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch
Replying to@1P64Th…1abU

I think this is also what @255 mentioned at CG London with his "in and out" investment plan (not sure how it was called)

Next step is your private "main Deggen BSV wallet" to let investors participate. I agree it sounds scary though!

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch
Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

But since Deggen would set the rules and not accept any shady offers, I would not see a problem.-

You are in full control. The investor depends solely on you and the deal is mainly set by what you accept. Nobody can force oneself into your income!

Continue thread →
1Dhq3b…hnPk Key · twetch
Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

It does sound scary! That's your subconscious figuring out the danger before you are consciously aware of it. Perhaps slavery was an exaggeration. Indentured servitude might be more accurate. The point is - once agreed - one cannot escape.

Continue thread →
1Dhq3b…hnPk Key · twetch
Replying to@1P64Th…1abU

My twetch didn't send in followup -- "To clarify - we diverge at this point. Pehaps this is a crack in the idea itself. I think it DOES matter whether this is an app or a person."

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch
Replying to@1Dhq3b…hnPk

Yes, "investing in app" and "investing in person" is not the same thing. Agreed!

The latter is not impossible though and should be doable via Bitcoin, as long as both sides negotiate a free deal. I dont know why so many argue like it was a thing by force