And the investor would not have to care whether Baemail is a company or just Deggen as a private person
All risks are on the investor's side, he has to do his job to find out if you are capable and trustworthy
again: classic investing
Post by twetch#1512
Totally agree. This is a good idea. Right now I run a script which pays out a percentage of Baemail revenue to a split of Paymails, with this concept in mind.
What the chain says
- Block
- 635 305
- Time
- 2020-05-17T10:43:25Z
- Signer
- 1P64ThNtECjBzA98VsPCMF8igPekxt1abU
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#1512
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1P64ThNtECjBzA98VsPCMF8igPekxt1abU VerifiedReplies (15)
I think this is also what @255 mentioned at CG London with his "in and out" investment plan (not sure how it was called)
Next step is your private "main Deggen BSV wallet" to let investors participate. I agree it sounds scary though!
But since Deggen would set the rules and not accept any shady offers, I would not see a problem.-
You are in full control. The investor depends solely on you and the deal is mainly set by what you accept. Nobody can force oneself into your income!
Every exchange has too sides. The problem is if you give the investee full control then you attract psychopaths who feel it is their duty to use their superior intelligence to defraud the ill informed investors.
I dont see it as our job to protect ill informed investors
ill informed investors = bad investors
But thats a whole other discussion about how much regulation should be in investment in general.
Since many were talking of "slavery" here...
If anything, Deggen would enslave the investor, not the other way around.
You are the company. Deggen is Baemail.
It does sound scary! That's your subconscious figuring out the danger before you are consciously aware of it. Perhaps slavery was an exaggeration. Indentured servitude might be more accurate. The point is - once agreed - one cannot escape.
Escape mechanisms are a question of detail
I wouldnt let someone participate from my income forever.
Set a date. Limit the investors participation. Do it for 1 year first or whatever. Maybe even monthly, weekly?
BSV makes it possible
My twetch didn't send in followup -- "To clarify - we diverge at this point. Pehaps this is a crack in the idea itself. I think it DOES matter whether this is an app or a person."
Yes, "investing in app" and "investing in person" is not the same thing. Agreed!
The latter is not impossible though and should be doable via Bitcoin, as long as both sides negotiate a free deal. I dont know why so many argue like it was a thing by force