Post by chris co

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch

then you are just wasting sats putting it on chain

1Pif9p…3xcE Unverified · twetch

except you would get the timestamp

What the chain says
Block
963 635
Time
2026-08-24T00:55:26Z
Signer
1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE Unverified

Replies (10)

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pif9p…3xcE

but it is encrypted
and you do not have the decrypt key
so all you have is a time stamp to something you cannot decrypt
so it proves nothing

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1aUt6N…jRpF

that's like proper Creg Vision

1Pif9p…3xcE Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1aUt6N…jRpF

you could encrypt one half. put the hash of the decrypted content next to the encrypted content. and keep a local copy of the content itself. that way you publish encrypted but have a timestamp to show provenance.

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pif9p…3xcE

you might as well only put the hash on chain
as that is all that matters then

Continue thread →

This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.